screenshot-to-code vs Locofy.ai
Locofy.ai is a paid AI design-to-code tool that integrates directly with Figma and converts designs into React, Gatsby, or Next.js code. It is a proprietary service with a subscription model; there is no self-hosted option.
| Feature | screenshot-to-code | Locofy.ai |
|---|
| License | MIT | Proprietary |
| Self-hosting | Yes (Docker Compose) | No |
| Input types | Screenshots, Figma exports, video recordings | Figma plugin integration |
| AI models | OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini (your keys) | Proprietary model |
| Output stacks | HTML, React, Vue, Bootstrap, Ionic (Tailwind options) | React, Gatsby, Next.js |
| Pricing | Free self-hosted; AI API costs only | Subscription |
screenshot-to-code is the better pick when you do not use Figma as your primary design tool, when you want to control which AI model generates the code, or when you need to keep designs off third-party servers. Locofy.ai has an advantage for teams working exclusively in Figma who want native plugin integration that reads layer names and component structure, not just the visual output.
screenshot-to-code vs Builder.io
Builder.io is a visual development platform with a design-to-code feature that generates React and Angular code from designs. It is primarily a managed hosting and visual CMS tool; the code export feature is part of a broader paid subscription.
| Feature | screenshot-to-code | Builder.io |
|---|
| License | MIT | Proprietary |
| Self-hosting | Yes | No |
| Primary use case | Screenshot or recording to code | Visual CMS with code export |
| Output stacks | HTML, React, Vue, Bootstrap, Ionic | React, Angular, Vue |
| Cost model | Free self-hosted | Subscription platform |
Builder.io makes sense when you want a full visual CMS and content editing workflow alongside code generation. screenshot-to-code is a better fit when you only need the image-to-code step, without paying for a broader platform you will not use.