Mailcheap vs Sendy
Both Mailcheap and Sendy are self-hosted newsletter tools that route sending through Amazon SES. The core value proposition is the same: pay for emails sent, not for subscribers stored. The differences are in licensing, features, and maintenance.
| Feature | Mailcheap | Sendy |
|---|
| License | MIT | Proprietary (one-time purchase) |
| Multi-user | No (single admin) | Yes |
| Autoresponders | No | Yes |
| Tech stack | Next.js, MongoDB | PHP, MySQL |
| Maintenance | One-time release | Actively maintained |
Sendy is the established product in this category, with multi-user access, autoresponders, and years of updates. For a team or anyone who needs automation sequences, Sendy is the practical choice. Where Mailcheap has an advantage is in licensing: MIT means no purchase cost and no restriction on forking. The Next.js codebase is more approachable for a JavaScript developer who wants to modify the sending pipeline or integrate newsletter signup into an existing app.
Mailcheap vs MailWizz
MailWizz is a PHP newsletter platform with a broader feature set: multiple delivery server support (SES, SendGrid, Postmark, SMTP), extensive automation, detailed reporting, and multi-user team management. It is licensed per domain with a one-time fee.
| Feature | Mailcheap | MailWizz |
|---|
| License | MIT | Proprietary (one-time purchase) |
| Multi-user | No | Yes |
| Delivery servers | Amazon SES only | Multiple (SES, SendGrid, Postmark, SMTP) |
| Automations | No | Yes |
| API | Basic (contacts, drafts) | Extensive |
| Tech stack | Next.js, MongoDB | PHP, MySQL |
MailWizz is the right choice for agencies managing multiple clients, teams with complex automation needs, or operators who want flexibility across delivery providers. Mailcheap is a better fit for solo operators who want MIT-licensed code they can read and extend, a modern JavaScript stack, and no purchase cost.