Hister vs Glean
Glean is an enterprise search platform that indexes connected SaaS tools (Gmail, Slack, Confluence, Jira) and surfaces results across a team. It runs as a fully managed cloud service with no self-hosting option for most customers.
Hister addresses a different scope: the pages you personally visit and the local files you keep. There is no SaaS connector layer; the index lives on the server you deploy.
| Feature | Hister | Glean |
|---|
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Proprietary |
| Self-hosting | Yes | No |
| Primary scope | Personal pages and local files | Team SaaS integrations |
| Pricing | Free to self-host | Enterprise subscription |
| Telemetry | None | Managed service |
Hister is the better choice when the goal is private, personal recall of what you have already read or saved, with no data sent to a third-party. Glean is the better choice when a team needs to search across shared SaaS tools from a single interface with organizational access controls.
Hister vs Coveo
Coveo is an AI-powered enterprise search platform that indexes content across an organization's connected systems. It operates as a cloud service with relevance tuning, analytics, and support for large enterprise deployments.
| Feature | Hister | Coveo |
|---|
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Proprietary |
| Self-hosting | Yes | No |
| Primary scope | Personal pages and local files | Enterprise content repositories |
| Pricing | Free to self-host | Enterprise subscription |
Hister is the better choice for individuals or small teams who want a private, self-hosted index with no per-seat cost. Coveo is the better choice when an enterprise needs AI-powered search across dozens of connected content systems, with analytics and administrative controls for large teams.
Hister vs Guru
Guru is a knowledge management platform designed for teams to create, curate, and share verified cards of institutional knowledge. It is a SaaS product focused on sales and support teams maintaining canonical answers.
Hister indexes what you personally browse and store; it does not have a team curation or card-publishing workflow. The use cases only partially overlap.
| Feature | Hister | Guru |
|---|
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Proprietary |
| Self-hosting | Yes | No |
| Primary scope | Personal index of pages and files | Team knowledge cards |
| Pricing | Free to self-host | Per-seat SaaS subscription |
| MCP server | Yes | No |
Hister wins when you want private full-text recall of your own reading history and local documents with no subscription. Guru is the better fit when a team needs to publish and maintain canonical answers, with a workflow for verifying and expiring knowledge cards.