Compositor vs Adobe Photoshop
Adobe Photoshop is the industry standard Compositor was built to replace for Mac users. The key differences are cost model and platform access.
| Feature | Compositor | Adobe Photoshop |
|---|
| License | MIT (free) | Proprietary |
| Price model | Free | Subscription |
| Platform | macOS 26+ on Apple silicon | macOS and Windows |
| CMYK support | No | Yes |
| PSD compatibility | Imports 8-bit RGB | Native format |
| Photoshop shortcuts | Yes (remappable) | Yes |
Compositor is the better choice for Apple silicon Mac users who want to stop paying a Photoshop subscription for compositing and post-processing work. Keyboard shortcuts carry over, the layer system replicates Photoshop's blend mode order, and PSD files open with editable layers. Adobe Photoshop remains the better choice for CMYK print work, Windows users, or anyone who needs features beyond compositing and post-processing, such as a video timeline, advanced type handling, or scripting with Photoshop Actions.
Compositor vs Affinity Photo 2
Affinity Photo 2 is a paid, proprietary image editor positioned as a Photoshop alternative on macOS, Windows, and iPad. Both tools target Photoshop users, but they differ on license, price, and platform coverage.
| Feature | Compositor | Affinity Photo 2 |
|---|
| License | MIT (free) | Proprietary |
| Price model | Free | One-time purchase |
| Source available | Yes | No |
| Platform | macOS 26+ on Apple silicon | macOS, Windows, iPad |
| CMYK support | No | Yes |
| AI-agent scripting | Yes (.comp format) | No |
Compositor is the better choice when zero licensing cost and source availability matter, or when you need AI-agent scriptability via the .comp project format. Affinity Photo 2 is the better choice for cross-platform teams that include Windows users, iPad workflows, or work requiring CMYK color mode.