Open Source Alternatives
  • Alternatives
  • Categories
    Categories by size882 projects
    • Developer Tools461
    • AI & Machine Learning404
    • Web Development196
    • Business & Productivity191
    • Communication & Collaboration126
    • Security & Monitoring126
    • IT Management123
    • Product & Project Management106
    • Cloud & Hosting105
    • Data & Analytics104
    Browse all 21 categoriesLLMOps & AI Tooling, Design & Creative and 9 more
  • Blog
  • Advertise
SearchNotion, Slack, password manager.../
Submit
Open Source Alternatives
  • Alternatives
    • Developer Tools461
    • AI & Machine Learning404
    • Web Development196
    • Business & Productivity191
    • Communication & Collaboration126
    • Security & Monitoring126
    • Browse all 21 categories
  • Blog
  • Advertise
Submit your project

New open source projects by email

The projects we add and every new guide. Free, unsubscribe any time.

Open Source Alternatives LogoOpen Source Alternatives

Handpicked Open Source Alternatives to Paid Softwares

Product

  • Categories
  • Tag
  • Advertise

Resources

  • Blog
  • Collection
  • Submit

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Refund Policy
  • Sitemap

Alternatives

  • Claude Code
  • Jira
  • Notion
  • Slack
  • Linear
  • Wispr Flow
  • All alternatives
© 2026 Open Source Alternatives. All rights reserved.
Open SourceAlternatives
Home/Categories/Communication & Collaboration/Jitsi
icon of Jitsi

Jitsi

Open source alternative to Zoom, Microsoft Teams and Google Meet

  • 30.1K stars
  • Apache-2.0
  • Active this week
  • Last commit 1 day ago

Last verified Oct 20, 2026

Host secure video meetings across web and mobile with an open source conferencing stack you can run yourself or embed in your app.

Visit websiteGitHub30.1K starsDeploy on Hostinger
image of Jitsi
TL;DR

Jitsi is a browser-based video conferencing tool for teams, communities, and app builders that need meetings without locking every call into Zoom or Microsoft Teams. Jitsi Meet can run as a hosted service or on your own infrastructure, and the Apache-2.0 license supports commercial use and modification. It is especially useful when video rooms need to be embedded into another product or community workflow.

Read the full breakdownHide the full breakdownWho it is for, how it works, trade-offs and the FAQ
who it's for

Who Jitsi is for#

Communities hosting private meetings

Use Jitsi when a community needs browser-accessible video rooms under its own domain or operating rules.

Skip if:

Skip it if the priority is enterprise admin policy, managed compliance exports, and vendor support.

Developers embedding video rooms

Use Jitsi when video calls belong inside your product instead of in a separate meeting app.

Skip if:

Skip it if you need a managed video SDK with guaranteed support contracts and usage-based SLAs.

the problem

The problem it solves#

Video meetings are now core infrastructure, but hosted meeting suites create lock-in around accounts, recordings, moderation controls, and pricing. Communities, schools, events, and product teams often need a meeting room without forcing every participant into a specific vendor ecosystem.

The issue gets sharper when video is part of a product experience. Embedding meetings, controlling branding, or enforcing private deployment rules can be awkward when the meeting vendor owns the entire room lifecycle.

how Jitsi solves it

How it solves it#

Browser-based meetings

Participants can join meetings from a browser with video, audio, chat, and screen sharing. That lowers friction for external guests who should not need a corporate account before joining a call.

Embeddable video rooms

Developers can embed Jitsi meetings into web products and community portals. This fits tutoring apps, support rooms, telehealth prototypes, and event spaces that need video inside an existing workflow.

Self-hosted meeting infrastructure

Teams can operate their own Jitsi deployment when they need control over domain, moderation settings, and infrastructure. That is a different tradeoff from buying hosted Zoom accounts for every use case.

strengths · trade-offs

Strengths and trade-offs#

Strengths

  • Open video stack under Apache-2.0Apache-2.0 licensing gives teams a permissive base for modification and commercial use. Product teams can evaluate Jitsi as video infrastructure instead of treating meetings as a closed vendor feature.
  • Flexible fit for communities and productsJitsi works for public community rooms, private team meetings, and embedded product calls. That range is useful when the same organization needs more than a standard calendar-linked meeting app.

Trade-offs

  • -Video infrastructure is demandingSelf-hosted Jitsi requires real operations work: bandwidth, TURN/STUN configuration, moderation choices, and monitoring. Zoom or Microsoft Teams will be simpler when you only need managed corporate meetings.
versus alternatives

Jitsi vs alternatives#

Jitsi vs Zoom

Jitsi is the better fit when teams need browser meetings, embedded video rooms, or self-hosted meeting infrastructure. Zoom is stronger for managed enterprise meetings, large admin deployments, webinar tooling, and vendor support. Choose Jitsi when control and embedding matter; choose Zoom when managed meeting operations matter more.

tech stack · detected from GitHub

What it's built on#

Languages
JavaJavaScriptLuaObjective-CTypeScript
Frameworks
React
Tooling
Webpack
frequently asked

FAQ#

What does Jitsi replace?

Jitsi can replace Zoom or Microsoft Teams for browser-based meetings, especially when teams need self-hosting or embedded rooms. It does not replace the full Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace collaboration suite.

Is Jitsi self-hosted?

Yes. Jitsi Meet can be self-hosted, though production deployments need networking, bandwidth, and operational care. Teams can also use hosted Jitsi options when they do not want to run the stack.

What license does Jitsi use?

Jitsi Meet is Apache-2.0 licensed. That permissive license allows commercial use, modification, and redistribution with standard notice requirements.

also worth a look

Similar open-source tools#

MiroTalk

Alternative toZoom

Free browser-based video calls with no sign-up required

  • 4,800 GitHub stars
  • AGPL-3.0Licence AGPL-3.0

dcts-shipping

Alternative toDiscord

Self-hosted Discord-style chat with encrypted DMs and voice

  • 645 GitHub stars
  • AGPL-3.0Licence AGPL-3.0

Rocket.Chat

Alternative toMicrosoft Teams

Self-hosted team chat with voice, video, and omnichannel support

  • 46,298 GitHub stars
  • MITLicence MIT

Prose

Alternative toSlack

Decentralized open source workplace with chat and docs

  • 59 GitHub stars
  • MPL-2.0Licence MPL-2.0

Adapt

Alternative toSlack

Lightweight self-hosted messaging platform for teams

  • 13 GitHub stars
  • AGPL-3.0Licence AGPL-3.0

SpacebarChat

Alternative toDiscord

Free open source Discord reimplementation with full API parity

  • 2,210 GitHub stars
  • AGPL-3.0Licence AGPL-3.0
by category

Open source tools in these categories#

126

Communication & Collaboration

freeCodeCamp, iptv, Excalidraw
105

Cloud & Hosting

dify, RuView, rtk
123

IT Management

RustDesk, Immich, Stirling PDF
Hostinger

Run Jitsi on your own server

Self-host Jitsi on a Hostinger VPS.

Deploy on Hostinger

Featured

Omnara

Alternative toCClaude Managed Agents

Open-source agent deployment API. Self-host or use Omnara Cloud.

  • 2,957 GitHub stars
  • Apache-2.0Licence Apache-2.0
  • #AI Agents

rakazo

Alternative toGrok Bot

AI teammates you own: your keys, your model, your machine.

  • 4,904 GitHub stars
  • Apache-2.0Licence Apache-2.0
  • #AI Agents

Inbox Zero

Alternative toSuperhuman

AI email assistant that drafts replies and clears your inbox

  • 12,712 GitHub stars
  • AGPL-3.0Licence AGPL-3.0
  • #Email
Feature your project

New open source projects by email

The projects we add and every new guide. Free, unsubscribe any time.

Find open source alternatives to paid software

/
  • Claude Code to OpenCode
  • Jira to Windshift
  • Notion to AppFlowy
  • Slack to Mattermost
  • Linear to GitLab
  • Wispr Flow to Handy
  • CapCut to Concat
  • Grok Bot to rakazo
  • Superhuman to Inbox Zero
  • Airtable to AITable
  • Muse to OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot to Cline
  • Datadog to Netdata
  • Microsoft Teams to Rocket.Chat
  • Pinecone to Qdrant
  • Zapier to n8n
  • Devin AI to OpenHands
  • Firebase to Supabase
  • 1Password to KeePassXC
  • Confluence to Docmost
  • Contentful to Strapi
  • Adobe Premiere Pro to Shotcut
  • ChatGPT to AnythingLLM
  • LangSmith to Langfuse
  • Claude Code to OpenCode
  • Jira to Windshift
  • Notion to AppFlowy
  • Slack to Mattermost
  • Linear to GitLab
  • Wispr Flow to Handy
  • CapCut to Concat
  • Grok Bot to rakazo
  • Superhuman to Inbox Zero
  • Airtable to AITable
  • Muse to OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot to Cline
  • Datadog to Netdata
  • Microsoft Teams to Rocket.Chat
  • Pinecone to Qdrant
  • Zapier to n8n
  • Devin AI to OpenHands
  • Firebase to Supabase
  • 1Password to KeePassXC
  • Confluence to Docmost
  • Contentful to Strapi
  • Adobe Premiere Pro to Shotcut
  • ChatGPT to AnythingLLM
  • LangSmith to Langfuse