FastAPI vs Flask
Flask is the most widely used Python micro-framework for API development, with a BSD-3-Clause license and a large ecosystem. FastAPI builds on similar ideas but replaces Flask's synchronous WSGI runtime with an async ASGI runtime and derives request validation, serialization, and OpenAPI documentation from Python type hints automatically.
| Feature | FastAPI | Flask |
|---|
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Async support | Native (ASGI, Uvicorn) | Via extension only |
| Request validation | Built-in via Pydantic | Separate library required |
| OpenAPI documentation | Auto-generated from code | Separate library required |
| Performance | On par with Node.js and Go | Lower (synchronous WSGI) |
FastAPI is the better choice for new Python API projects where async I/O, automatic documentation, and type-validated inputs matter. Flask remains a reasonable option for maintaining existing applications or for simple synchronous endpoints where the added type system creates more overhead than value.
FastAPI vs AWS API Gateway
AWS API Gateway is a managed service that routes HTTP requests to Lambda functions or other AWS backends, with no persistent server to operate. FastAPI is a Python framework running as a persistent ASGI process on server infrastructure you manage.
| Feature | FastAPI | AWS API Gateway |
|---|
| License | MIT open source | Proprietary (AWS) |
| Pricing | Server cost only | Per-million API calls |
| Deployment | Any server or cloud | AWS only |
| Execution model | Persistent ASGI process | Serverless (Lambda per call) |
| Custom logic | Full Python in-process | Lambda function per route |
FastAPI is the better choice when you need complex Python logic in a single codebase, cost predictability at high request volumes, or the ability to deploy to any cloud provider without vendor lock-in. AWS API Gateway is better when you want zero server management, tight AWS ecosystem integration, and pay-per-use pricing at low or irregular traffic volumes.