Dify vs Relevance AI
Both tools let teams build and deploy AI workflows without starting from scratch in code. The core difference is the hosting model: Relevance AI is cloud-only with no self-hosting path; Dify supports self-hosted, VPC, and managed cloud deployment.
| Feature | Dify | Relevance AI |
|---|
| Self-hosting | Yes (Docker Compose, Kubernetes) | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 with additional terms | Proprietary |
| LLM providers | 100+ providers | OpenAI-centric |
| RAG pipeline | Built-in, configurable | Limited |
| Pricing | Free (Community Edition) / paid cloud | Paid plans required |
Dify is the better choice when your team needs data residency, model flexibility, or cost control at volume. Relevance AI is the better fit when your team is non-technical, infrastructure management is a deal-breaker, and its pre-built templates align with your use case.
Dify vs Stack AI
Stack AI is an enterprise-focused managed platform for LLM-powered workflows and APIs, with a visual builder that targets teams building AI automation without custom development. The key difference versus Dify is Stack AI's cloud-only model against Dify's self-hosting path.
| Feature | Dify | Stack AI |
|---|
| Self-hosting | Yes (Docker, Kubernetes) | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 with additional terms | Proprietary |
| Open source | Yes (Community Edition on GitHub) | No |
| Agent support | Yes (MCP, tool use, Marketplace) | Yes |
| Enterprise | VPC, SSO, RBAC, SOC 2 | Managed enterprise plans |
Dify wins for teams that need to self-host inside a VPC, use open-source models, or audit their AI application stack. Stack AI is worth considering when your organization's primary requirement is a fully managed service with enterprise support and no infrastructure ownership.