Open Source Alternatives
  • Alternatives
  • Categories
    Categories by size882 projects
    • Developer Tools461
    • AI & Machine Learning404
    • Web Development196
    • Business & Productivity191
    • Communication & Collaboration126
    • Security & Monitoring126
    • IT Management123
    • Product & Project Management106
    • Cloud & Hosting105
    • Data & Analytics104
    Browse all 21 categoriesLLMOps & AI Tooling, Design & Creative and 9 more
  • Blog
  • Advertise
SearchNotion, Slack, password manager.../
Submit
Open Source Alternatives
  • Alternatives
    • Developer Tools461
    • AI & Machine Learning404
    • Web Development196
    • Business & Productivity191
    • Communication & Collaboration126
    • Security & Monitoring126
    • Browse all 21 categories
  • Blog
  • Advertise
Submit your project

New open source projects by email

The projects we add and every new guide. Free, unsubscribe any time.

Open Source Alternatives LogoOpen Source Alternatives

Handpicked Open Source Alternatives to Paid Softwares

Product

  • Categories
  • Tag
  • Advertise

Resources

  • Blog
  • Collection
  • Submit

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Refund Policy
  • Sitemap

Alternatives

  • Claude Code
  • Jira
  • Notion
  • Slack
  • Linear
  • Wispr Flow
  • All alternatives
© 2026 Open Source Alternatives. All rights reserved.
Open SourceAlternatives
Home/Categories/Business & Productivity/Automatisch
icon of Automatisch

Automatisch

Open source alternative to Zapier, Make and Microsoft Power Automate

  • 14K stars
  • Updated this year
  • Last commit 252 days ago

Last verified Oct 6, 2026

Automate app workflows on your own infrastructure with a self-hosted Zapier alternative for teams that need data control.

Visit websiteGitHub14K stars1-click deploy on Hostinger
image of Automatisch
TL;DR

Automatisch is a self-hosted workflow automation tool for connecting apps and automating routine business processes without writing full integration services. It replaces Zapier, Make, and Microsoft Power Automate for teams that want workflow ownership and lower vendor dependence. Community files are AGPL-3.0, while .ee. files use an enterprise license.

Read the full breakdownHide the full breakdownWho it is for, how it works, trade-offs and the FAQ
who it's for

Who Automatisch is for#

Operations teams self-hosting automations

Automatisch fits teams routing leads, syncing support data, and sending notifications where workflow data should stay under their own infrastructure controls.

Skip if:

Use Zapier if connector breadth and hosted convenience are more important than self-hosting.

Small teams reducing integration scripts

Teams can move simple recurring integration tasks out of custom scripts and into a workflow UI. This helps non-developers maintain routine automations safely.

Skip if:

Skip it if your workflows require complex code, long-running jobs, or enterprise integration patterns better served by a workflow orchestrator.

the problem

The problem it solves#

Zapier-style automations become part of business operations quickly: lead routing, support triage, billing updates, notifications, and data sync. When those workflows live in a proprietary service, teams depend on external pricing, connector limits, and vendor availability for routine operations.\u000A\u000ASome organizations also cannot send operational data through a third-party automation vendor. They need a workflow tool they can host close to the systems being connected.

how Automatisch solves it

How it solves it#

No-code workflow builder

Automatisch lets users define triggers and actions between connected apps through a workflow UI. That supports routine business automation without building every integration from scratch.

Self-hosted automation runtime

Teams can run Automatisch on their own infrastructure, keeping workflow execution and connected-account data under their chosen controls.

App integration model

Automatisch is designed around connecting common SaaS and internal tools. It fits lead handoffs, notifications, CRM updates, and lightweight data movement.

strengths · trade-offs

Strengths and trade-offs#

Strengths

  • Zapier-like workflow ownershipAutomatisch gives teams a familiar automation pattern without making every workflow depend on a hosted automation vendor. That matters for privacy-sensitive operations.
  • Useful bridge between no-code and engineeringNon-developers can create routine workflows, while technical teams can host and govern the runtime. This reduces pressure to build small integration services for every process.

Trade-offs

  • -Connector coverage may trail ZapierZapier and Make have much larger connector ecosystems. Automatisch is better for control, but teams should verify every required app integration before migration.
  • -AGPL core with enterprise filesAutomatisch applies AGPL-3.0 to repository files except .ee. files, which are covered by an enterprise license. Teams modifying and offering it over a network should review AGPL obligations and enterprise feature boundaries.
versus alternatives

Automatisch vs alternatives#

Automatisch vs Zapier

Automatisch and Zapier both connect apps through trigger-action workflows, but Automatisch is self-hosted while Zapier is a hosted proprietary automation service.

CriterionAutomatischZapier
LicenseAGPL-3.0 core with enterprise-licensed .ee. filesProprietary SaaS
HostingSelf-hostedManaged SaaS
Connector ecosystemSmaller, verify required appsVery large
Best fitWorkflow ownership and privacyFast hosted automation with broad connectors

Automatisch is the better choice when workflow data should stay under team control. Zapier is still better when teams need the largest connector catalog and do not want to operate automation infrastructure.

tech stack · detected from GitHub

What it's built on#

Languages
JavaScript
Frameworks
ExpressReactVue
Databases
PostgreSQL
frequently asked

FAQ#

Is Automatisch a Zapier alternative?

Yes. Automatisch is positioned as an open source Zapier alternative for building workflow automations. Its main advantage is the self-hosted deployment model.

Can Automatisch be self-hosted?

Yes. Automatisch is designed to run on your own infrastructure. Self-hosting gives more control over workflow data and connected accounts.

Is Automatisch open source?

Automatisch Community Edition code is AGPL-3.0 except .ee. files, which use an enterprise license. Review the AGPL and enterprise boundaries before commercial modification or hosted use.

also worth a look

Similar open-source tools#

Node-RED

Alternative toMicrosoft Power Automate

Low-code event-driven programming with a browser-based editor

  • 23,766 GitHub stars
  • Apache-2.0Licence Apache-2.0

n8n

Featured

Alternative toZapier

Self-hosted workflow automation with 400+ node connectors

  • 208,117 GitHub stars

Huginn

Alternative toZapier

Self-hosted agents that watch the web and trigger automations

  • 50,085 GitHub stars
  • MITLicence MIT

Activepieces

Alternative toZapier

Build AI-powered automations and agents without vendor lock-in

  • 25,140 GitHub stars
  • MITLicence MIT

AI-Flow

Alternative toGumloop

Visually chain AI models and APIs into automated pipelines

  • 292 GitHub stars
  • MITLicence MIT

rakazo

Featured

Alternative toGrok Bot

AI teammates you own: your keys, your model, your machine.

  • 4,904 GitHub stars
  • Apache-2.0Licence Apache-2.0
by category

Open source tools in these categories#

191

Business & Productivity

OpenClaw, Excalidraw, RustDesk35

No-Code & Low-Code

n8n, dify, Langflow78

APIs & Integration

Firecrawl, n8n, iptv
Hostinger

Run Automatisch on your own server

Hostinger sets Automatisch up as a one-click app on a VPS.

Deploy on Hostinger

Featured

Omnara

Alternative toCClaude Managed Agents

Open-source agent deployment API. Self-host or use Omnara Cloud.

  • 2,957 GitHub stars
  • Apache-2.0Licence Apache-2.0
  • #AI Agents

Inbox Zero

Alternative toSuperhuman

AI email assistant that drafts replies and clears your inbox

  • 12,712 GitHub stars
  • AGPL-3.0Licence AGPL-3.0
  • #Email

rakazo

Alternative toGrok Bot

AI teammates you own: your keys, your model, your machine.

  • 4,904 GitHub stars
  • Apache-2.0Licence Apache-2.0
  • #AI Agents
Feature your project

New open source projects by email

The projects we add and every new guide. Free, unsubscribe any time.

Find open source alternatives to paid software

/
  • Claude Code to OpenCode
  • Jira to Windshift
  • Notion to AppFlowy
  • Slack to Mattermost
  • Linear to GitLab
  • Wispr Flow to Handy
  • CapCut to Concat
  • Grok Bot to rakazo
  • Superhuman to Inbox Zero
  • Airtable to AITable
  • Muse to OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot to Cline
  • Datadog to Netdata
  • Microsoft Teams to Rocket.Chat
  • Pinecone to Qdrant
  • Zapier to n8n
  • Devin AI to OpenHands
  • Firebase to Supabase
  • 1Password to KeePassXC
  • Confluence to Docmost
  • Contentful to Strapi
  • Adobe Premiere Pro to Shotcut
  • ChatGPT to AnythingLLM
  • LangSmith to Langfuse
  • Claude Code to OpenCode
  • Jira to Windshift
  • Notion to AppFlowy
  • Slack to Mattermost
  • Linear to GitLab
  • Wispr Flow to Handy
  • CapCut to Concat
  • Grok Bot to rakazo
  • Superhuman to Inbox Zero
  • Airtable to AITable
  • Muse to OpenClaw
  • GitHub Copilot to Cline
  • Datadog to Netdata
  • Microsoft Teams to Rocket.Chat
  • Pinecone to Qdrant
  • Zapier to n8n
  • Devin AI to OpenHands
  • Firebase to Supabase
  • 1Password to KeePassXC
  • Confluence to Docmost
  • Contentful to Strapi
  • Adobe Premiere Pro to Shotcut
  • ChatGPT to AnythingLLM
  • LangSmith to Langfuse